"Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. Do we know" . The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. That's not the case. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. 4. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. (Source: iStockphoto). But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. or call us at 1-617-450-2300. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? 3. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. [18] A BBC reviewer described it as "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. 1. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? What the Bleep Do We Know!? What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . 1. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? DO WE KNOW? Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. You can renew your subscription or ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics. But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. What the Bleep!? Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest 34 talking about this. [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. The film was also discussed in a letter published in Physics Today that challenges how physics is taught, saying teaching fails to "expose the mysteries physics has encountered [and] reveal the limits of our understanding". It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." Our work isn't possible without your support. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. (stylized as What t #$*! 3. The host of the show said this was done because it was negative bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. If we don't understand classical consciousness, how can we understand quantum consciousness? 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. to someone you know: The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. That's its claim anyway. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. Nobody does.". As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? - - Where were we now? so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. and What the #$*! But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? Film / What the #$*! My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. But that still doesn't mean that, at a global level, the weirdness of quantum mechanics is manifest. up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. So does classical physics. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. We don't know which way it's going to go. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? subscription. The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). It was really hard to sit through. He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. Tags: science-and-technology, neuroscience, physics. "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. At the end of this article, Dr Simons invites readers to explore the limitations of their own brains. What the #$*! So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. . and published a study guide. [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. What the Bleep Do We Know!? 1. We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context.